Late-season boll damage puzzling for growers

Stinkbugs were a consistent and widespread problem throughout the upper Southeast in 2006. Late-season boll damage was another constant problem throughout the 2006 season, and some believe brown and green stinkbugs were the culprits.

At the recent North Carolina Agriculture Consultants Association meeting there was a consensus among members that stinkbugs were a big problem.

Several consultants noted seeing heavy damage, attributed to stinkbugs, late in the growing season.

Ames Herbert, an entomologist and head of Virginia Tech’s IPM program and long-time North Carolina State University Entomologist Jack Bacheler, conducted an informal clinic on cotton insect problems and shared some findings that mirrored the late season concerns of consultants.

“In some of the fields I manage, as I watched the boll as it got larger, it got past the point where it should be safe, and I found damage, particular in the crease or the bottom of the boll,” said Stan Winslow, a consultant in Camden, N.C. “I’m not sure whether the damage occurred late, or I didn’t see it earlier,” he continued.

Bacheler says it is difficult after a boll is a month or so old for a stinkbug to penetrate a boll wall. “We look at bolls all year and it’s very difficult to differentiate stinkbug damage from damage caused by many other internal and external factors. Sometimes we get mystery damage in year-end bolls in the form of a big brown spot at the base, but we don’t think that is stinkbug damage,” he says.

Herbert says his research team found a number of basal punctures to cotton bolls in 2006. There is no evidence at all on the outside, but when you break open the boll, you see locks that are completely destroyed. There is a weak spot where the locks come together that seem to be susceptible to stinkbug penetration and feeding, he says.

Herbert contends there may be a variety relationship to late season damage. Some varieties have thinner boll walls and can be susceptible to stinkbug damage longer than other varieties, he adds.

“If you put yourself in the head of a stinkbug, you are not going to an old boll to feed, if there are young bolls on the plant. If I’m a stinkbug, I am going to the quarter-size bolls that are easier to get into. I want to feed on the seed and the little bolls aren’t as desirable because the seed haven’t developed. The older bolls are more difficult to penetrate. So I am going after the quarter-size bolls that have tender seeds and the boll wall is easier to penetrate,” he explains.

Bacheler agrees that some varieties are more susceptible than others to stinkbug damage, but contends work at North Carolina State University has not been successful in determining which varieties are more or less susceptible.

“We see a lot of mature bolls that are spotted up and have a lot of external damage, but the boll wall is too tough for the stinkbug to penetrate. When you see a large number of bolls spotted up, chances are there will be heavier than normal stinkbug damage. However, sometimes you see the external spotting and find very little actual damage to the boll,” Bacheler says.

Unfortunately, the relationship between stinkbug damage to bolls and its impact on cotton yields appears to vary significantly from field to field and from year to year. In 2004 for example, in four "bug-protected" vs. untreated replicated tests, each 10 percent year-end boll damage resulted in yield losses ranging from 36 to 107 pounds of lint per acre.

Given that the damaged boll assessments were taken just prior to boll opening, the relationship between bug damage and yields would likely have been even more variable if these evaluations had taken place earlier when these bolls were quarter-sized. The mean yield loss of these four tests was approximately 60 pounds of lint per 10 percent boll damage, or 7 pounds of lint for every 1 percent damaged boll (the narrower range for bollworm damage to bolls varied from 8.9 to 19.3 pounds of lint per 1 percent boll damage in a series of 8 bollworm threshold tests).

“Looking back at our 2004 state-wide boll damage of 15 percent by bugs on Bt cotton, by any yardstick stinkbugs scored some significant boll damage,” Bacheler says.

“Stinkbugs damage growing cotton bolls by piercing the boll wall and feeding on the seeds and juices within the bolls. We conducted this research to determine whether this damage influences cotton textile mill performance. We found that fiber properties and yarn and fabric quality were not improved with insecticide applications to control this pest,” says Philip Bauer, with USDA.

Danny Pierce, a crop consultant in Princeton, N.C., says last year he saw more cumulative damage late in the season from stinkbugs and worms. “In one field, we sprayed a high rate of a pyrethroid and Bidrin when bolls were first susceptible. Then, we sprayed two more times with a high rate of pyrethroids,” he notes.

Despite the three applications on this Bollgard cotton, applied every two weeks, Pierce recorded 40 percent bollworm damage. Bacheler came back and checked the same field and rated the field at 30 percent damage. That is another problem, Pierce says, damage ratings are variable, and until the crop is harvested, there is little way to know what the real damage is to the crop.

Winslow says he seems to see more stinkbug damage on early planted cotton. Herbert says that stinkbugs tend to come into early planted fields, lay eggs, and stay as long as the food source is there. So, it’s likely that early-planted cotton will get more damage because the crop is susceptible for a longer period of time.”

e-mail: [email protected]

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.